Evaluating Internet Sources

Is the information accurate when checked against other sources?
How reliable and error-free is the information?
Is there evidence of potential bias?
Does the author have a specific agenda or point-of-view?

Is it clear who is sponsoring the web page? Is the sponsor legitimate?
Is it clear who wrote the page?
Are the qualifications of the author clearly stated?
Is the author affiliated with an institution or organization?
Is there contact information available for the author of the document?

What is the purpose of the web page, i.e. to inform, convince, or sell?
What does it contribute to the literature in the field?
Who is the intended audience based on content, tone, and style?
What is the overall value of the content compared to the range of resources on the topic?

Does the site cover the subject adequately?
Are there inexplicable omissions?
Links
Links are relevant and appropriate
Don't assume that the linked sites are the best available. Be sure to investigate additional sites on the topic

Is the publication date clearly stated?
When was the page last revised?
 Is it maintained and updated regularly?
Are the links on the page up-to-date and useable?

Does the author explain where the information was obtained?
Does the web page contain a bibliography or list of sources used?

Indicators of Scholarship
Describes limits of research or data.
Presents accurate description of alternate viewpoints
Encourages debate, discussion, and criticism.
Settles disputes by use of generally accepted criteria for evaluating data.
Looks for counter-examples.
Updates information.
Admits own ignorance.
Relies on critical thinking skills

Indicators of Propaganda
Excessive claims of certainty, i.e. one "right" way of thinking.
Relies on personal attacks and ridicule.
Emotional appeals. Use of inflammatory language.
Suppresses contradictory views.
Appeals to popular prejudices.
Devalues critical appraisal.
Transforms words and statistics to suit purpose.
Presents information and views out of context.